| Schools unhurt by admissions change
Four prominent universities that ditched their early admissions programs have answered questions about whether the move would hurt their popularity. That answer is no. All are reporting record applications this year. Harvard, Princeton and the University of Virginia attracted widespread attention with announcements in 2006 that they would stop holding a separate, early round of admissions in the fall. They argued the practice contributes to anxiety and disadvantages students who need financial aid. This year, they began considering all applicants in a single pool with a January deadline. The University of Florida later made a similar announcement and moved to a single deadline of Nov. 1. Most selective schools kept some form of early admissions. Now, the results are in.
Penn Treaty more likely to enter joint venture or sell assets than to ...
In December 2007, it received an extension from the NYSE until 16 February to file its annual report. The company has said that it expects to make a decision regarding any financial restatements by later this month, according to regulatory filings. Also according to regulatory documents, Penn Treaty's right to sell policies in Florida was suspended for at least one year for failure to file its 2006 financial results by 1 June. Penn Treaty said at the time that the suspension would not be material to its financial performance, as its right to sell policies represented 6% of its new business applications for the first five months of 2007. Florida sales, however, accounted for approximately 15% of the company's direct premium revenue last year, according to company figures.
A Spirited Disposition Debate
Supporters of a traditional curriculum have argued that evaluating students based on their commitment to social justice is an inherently subjective practice with ideological undertones. Late last year, the National Association of Scholars filed a complaint with the Education Department saying the accreditor encourages standards that violate students' First Amendment rights. Arthur E. Wise, president of NCATE, has argued that the “disposition" component of evaluation helps education schools measure how their students would respond in a classroom setting. On Monday, as Wise sat before the Education Department’s National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, which has the power to extend the council’s authority or set the agenda for changes, a set of critics raised the issue once again.
|
